The Popular Documentary is Influencing Christians’ Beliefs on Bible Prophecy. Is it Helpful or Harmful?
L
ast month I received an email asking for my opinion on Brent Miller Jr.’s documentary film Before the Wrath (2020). I was familiar with the film, having seen it come up in Twitter conversations multiple times in the past few years. I knew I disagreed with the overall message (which the person who asked me knows), but I had never actually sat down to watch it, so I said I would get back with him. This film could be an influence on the end times beliefs of brethren you may engage with, so I thought it would be a good idea to share what I have learned with you also.
Profound Discovery, or Sleight of Hand?
I spent a lot of time on the opening sequence, which is also the trailer for the film.
It begins by showing a young woman, purportedly from ancient times. A female voiceover says1, “As Galileans, we witnessed His first miracle. He warned us that a time of great deception would come. But we must hold onto our faith, that one day He would return to save us from the end of the world.” Her sweet voice implies Christians will be saved from experiencing the tribulations of the end (what is found in Revelation 6-18), but this is not true. Our sure hope is in the return of Jesus Christ, not in being bodily removed before the final work to fulfill the great commission in the face of great suffering.
Next, they stitched together portions of quotes from most of the people who regularly appear in the film. J.D. Farag, Senior Pastor of Calvary Chapel Kaneohe, in Hawaii, says2, “Most people don’t believe that Jesus is coming back. What if there was evidence that proves this is all real?” The unbelievers, who are the majority, do not believe He’s coming back. But this film is aimed towards Christians, right, who all believe He is coming back? (It really is.) If he was just talking about the second coming, as suggested in the first sentence, we have the Bible, and not a blind faith—because God fulfilled other prophecies (especially in Jesus’ first coming) to give us faith in Him and His Word. What J.D. is doing is conflating the second coming of Christ with a secret Pre-Tribulation Rapture. Jay McCarl (presented in his next appearance as “Middle East Anthropologist”), Jack Hibbs (Senior Pastor of Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, in California), Jan Markell (Founder, Olive Tree Ministries), and again J.D. Farag’s comments are edited together as one cohesive statement. They say3: “Because there were so many people bringing up little bits and pieces of this, I’m thinking, ‘There’s got to be a pattern here.’ The Bible talks about it as being a mystery, but why does the rapture have to happen? What’s the point to it all? A Galilean would have understood that perfectly. They are the key to everything. I’m just so stunned! I never thought I would see this in my lifetime. This is the most profound discovery in human history.” They moved the subject from the coming of Christ onto a mysterious, not straightforward, extra-Biblical, (they call it “Before the Wrath”) rapture. They are priming the viewer to accept it, being convinced why it must happen. This is modern-day Gnosticism.
A young woman (purportedly a first-century Galilean) explains4, “From His promise made through wine at the Last Supper, to why the world cannot know the day of His return, we were chosen to preserve the truth until the end of days. So even if we are not spared from death, others can unveil what we knew and believe.” (The hope of Pre-Tribulation Rapture is to be spared from death and having to face the tribulations described in Revelation 6-18.)
Now these words appear on the screen, a few words at a time—the end of the title sequence5: “After 2,000 years, rediscover the truth: why Jesus will return before the wrath.”
Next, a man implied to be from ancient days composes a letter on a scroll, then seals it with a wax seal. This part is read by the film’s narrator, Kevin Sorbo. You may know Kevin’s name from the title role of Hercules (1995), the God’s Not Dead films, or his latest film, Left Behind: Rise of the Antichrist (2023).
Here is some of the narrative6: “Know that a time of great tribulation approaches, such as has not been seen since the beginning of the world, nor shall there ever be again. But our Lord will return to retrieve those that follow Him from that wrath that will be poured out on all who are living on the face of the earth…” The way it is presented, in the opening sequence of the film, the viewer could forget we are dealing with a hypothesis, and not a real person writing a historic document.
The fictional first century man continues7: “Though the convergence of signs for His return have been revealed to you throughout the Scriptures, there are some mysteries that God proclaims will be sealed until the time of the end, understanding that will be unveiled to the generation that will witness the return of Messiah.” In keeping with what I have seen already, it seems the filmmaker implies the last generation should seek final understanding apart from the Scriptures—a Gnostic concept.
“Why Can’t Most Christians Get on the Same Page?”
Next, the film’s major participants talk about how the Church cannot agree on the details and timing of a rapture. There is an attitude that you do well if you agree with them, but if not, you are divisive and part of a problem leading towards apostasy.
The Executive Director of LifeWay Research, Scott McConnell, as well as its Qualitative Director, Lizette Dillinger, appear to discuss the results of a survey they conducted about people’s beliefs on the rapture. Pre-Tribulation Rapture got the top result, at 36%, but they and the film’s makers are concerned.
Scott says8, “I’m sure that somebody that has not bought into the teachings of Jesus Christ, you know, scratch their head a little bit, if something this important about Jesus returning, Christians can’t even explain how that’s going to happen.” In other words, he thinks non-believers might be perplexed and possibly put off by the fact that Christians cannot agree on end times prophecy.
Lizette opines9, “People have access to a lot of information right at their fingertips, so they want to go and develop their ideas on their own, they want to put together this cornucopia of eschatological knowledge without any kind of hermeneutical framework, but it really may not match up with any of the views out there.” Her words come across very patronizing to me. The average church goer might not be familiar with the words “eschatological” and “hermeneutical.” “Eschatological” is pertaining to last things–death, judgment, and the final destiny of the soul/mankind; and “hermeneutical” is concerning a method of interpretation of literary texts, in this case, of the Bible. There are some very strange interpretations I come across sometimes, but what she is doing is demeaning people who do their own research, which I do not respect at all, encouraging them, in effect, to leave it to the “experts.” Spiritual things are not the domain of scholars, but of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14), who gives generously and without partiality to saints who ask in faith for wisdom (James 1:5-8). Jesus thanked the Father for revealing to “babes” what He hides from the wise and prudent (Matthew 11:25-26).
After this, Kevin narrates10: “Then why can’t most Christians get on the same page when it comes to the return of their Messiah?” There is an edge in Kevin’s voice when he says, “Then why can’t most Christians get on the same page,” and then it softens.
J.D. complains11, “There is so much infighting about when Jesus is coming back, nobody’s stopped and asked why.” Next, Jay12 asserts, “But the fact is, the timing is not nearly as important as the why of His return. People forget to even ask, why is Jesus coming back? Why is all this going to happen? Why must there be an end of the world?” This is a diversionary tactic, simply stating that the timing is not that important, with no Biblical argument. They deviate to “Why?” (and they are talking about a Pre-Tribulation Rapture, not the second coming, which is what “His return” is typically understood). So, we have been summarily told the timing is not nearly as important, and this movie will focus on “Why does [Pre-Trib] Rapture have to happen?”
At the end of this section, narrator Kevin Sorbo asks13: “So, what is the point? Are the events of the end times simply a sequence of ancient superstitions, or did those that were with Christ understand something much greater that was buried by the sands of time?” It is offensive to me that he asks if the end times are a sequence of ancient superstitions, or essentially, a Gnostic mystery lost and later uncovered. The Holy Spirt and the Bible have no place in this discussion.
Galilean Wedding Traditions
The filmmakers talk about how Jesus was not just a Jew, He was a Galilean, and all His followers were Galileans. They infer the mystery of the why of the rapture is found in Galilean wedding traditions.
The film makes several claims:
- Galilean weddings are different from other Jewish and middle eastern weddings at the time.14
- In betrothal, the bride had the power to accept or reject the groom’s offer when he handed her a cup of wine. Drinking from the cup he offered to her was a sign of her acceptance of the terms of the marriage.15
- After the bride drinks from the cup, the groom also drinks and announces before witnesses, “You are now consecrated to me by the laws of Moses, and I will not drink of this cup again until I drink it anew with you in my father’s house.”16
- When Jesus said, “This is My blood of the new covenant,” Galileans would have associated it with the cup in a betrothal ceremony.17
- The date and time of Galilean weddings was a mystery known only to the groom’s father.18
- The groom tells his father, “I want my bride.” The father responds, “I’ll tell you when.” At a day and moment of his own choosing, the groom’s father would tell his son, “Go get your bride.”19
- Galilean weddings typically began at night when the guests were likely to be sleeping.20
- The groom would awake the town with trumpets.21
- The bride, attendants, and guests would have very little time to join the assembly once awakened, so they needed to be dressed already and have oil for their lamps.22
- When the groom reached his bride, she would be lifted into the air and carried on a special chair. The ancient Galileans referred to this as, “flying the bride to the father’s house.”23
- When the bridal procession had entered the father’s house, the door would be shut, and no one departs or enters for seven days.24
Some of these details could be true, however, there is no documentation in this film as to where any of this information about Galilean weddings came from. They just state what they say they found. This is irresponsible, because what they promised from the beginning was “the most profound discovery in human history.” A discovery with no substantiation treats the viewer like a child. Also, even if all these so-called Galilean wedding traditions were true, it still does not infer a Pre-Tribulation Rapture as the filmmakers do. Generally, Pre-Tribulation Rapture believers think we go to heaven for the wedding supper of the Lamb, while the folks who did not know better have to endure the Tribulation here on earth. The implication is that the “Tribulation saints” come to Christ in a vacuum, and with zero witness or discipleship, finish the great commission under great pressure. Some believe seven days (the supposed length of the Galilean wedding feast) is symbolic for a seven-year Tribulation.
Recently I found a tweet by a man who posted on his website the e-mail traffic back and forth between him, director Brent Miller Jr., and Jay McCarl. He continually asked for substantiation of all their Galilean wedding claims, and these men produced nothing, which led him to believe they made it all up—and that would not shock me at all. One of the things in the e-mail discussion between these men was interesting. Jay is saying he is not a Middle East anthropologist—he is in fact a Calvary Chapel pastor for the past twenty years. He said the PR team made the choice to present him that way, but he does not have any degree in anthropology. That is quite unethical on the part of the PR team, and is a black mark on this production.
“You’ve Got the Wrong Jesus!”
Thirty minutes into the film, Kevin narrates25, “But unlike the earthly custom, where the groom will bring his bride back to his father’s house, Jesus was speaking in a heavenly realm, where only those that are born again, having agreed to be His bride, could go.” Then Jack expresses26, “It’s Jesus who introduced the doctrine of the rapture to us. I’m gonna come and pick you up, take you back to where I’ve been. You need to understand something, if you don’t have that event taking place in your theology, you’ve got the wrong Jesus.” It really feels like he’s reaching through the screen and thumping his finger into my chest. He is taking the Scripture out of context by inferring the wedding supper will take place in heaven—that is what he is getting at. The bride is not even declared ready for the wedding supper until right before Jesus comes back after the Tribulation (see Revelation 19:7-8, up to the account of His coming, beginning in verse 11). Until after the first resurrection (Revelation 20:4-6) and the subsequent catching up of the alive and remain at His coming (1 Thessalonians 4:15-17), we are not all together in one place. Though Revelation 19 speaks of the wedding supper, the only ones literally eating are the birds, who gorge themselves on the flesh of the wicked Jesus slays. The feast for people is found in Isaiah 26:5, and the context is on Mount Zion in Jerusalem, where Jesus reigns after His Post-Tribulation return (Isaiah 24:23).
Now, Jack is really saying, if you’re not Pre-Trib, you’ve got the wrong Jesus. That is how it comes across to me. He continues27: “If Jesus doesn’t come back for His Church, then we all have the wrong Jesus. He so has to come back that it’s mandatory, it is absolutely a definitive event! It defines either we have the right Jesus or the wrong Jesus, based upon the Biblical Jesus coming back or not, he has to come back.” We are Christians—not one of us believes He is not coming back! But Jack is conflating Jesus’ second coming with a mythical Pre-Tribulation event.
Expectations and Apostasy
Speaking of date setters, whom the filmmakers blame for denigrating Christians’ interest in Bible prophecy, Amir Tsarfati, an Israeli who founded Behold Israel, says28: “When you start setting days and then it doesn’t happen, then you have millions or hundreds of thousands of disappointed people, that good chances that they’ll walk away from that faith, because it wasn’t proved right.” How ironic, because this very point of people being offended and apostatizing when reality does not match what they have been told, is precisely why Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching is so dangerous.
Amir says29, “Look, when you live in this world, and suddenly someone tells you, ‘You’re about to be taken physically out of this world’, then knowing the day is like hitting the jackpot. However, it saddens me that even though Jesus Himself said, ‘No one know the day and the hour,’ why do we think we need to know? It sends a clear message—we’re not supposed to deal with the actual date. We’re supposed to deal with the preparation for that day.” I believe this is a subtle dig against those who teach that His gathering is at His coming—but who are not predicting an exact day or hour.
Jan says she is stunned at the lack of interest from pastors in end times. Now these folks just look at the camera and lie—in my opinion, because this is how their ministries survive. Jan Markell’s Olive Tree Ministries, in 2020, drew in 3.25 million dollars in revenue. Amir Tsarfati’s Behold Israel had over 5 million dollars in revenue. Obviously, a lot of people are buying into the idea they are presenting—and that is Pre-Tribulation Rapture. I think one of the most dangerous things about this film is people could decide to seek out any of them for wisdom about the end times. And they will just be taught how to twist the Scriptures.
Amir opines30, “Christians always want to be accepted by the world. They are always on the run to adopt and embrace worldly views in order for people to like them. You sugarcoat everything, you become a motivational speaker rather than a pastor. Because if you come to a non-believer, and you pull out this rapture card, he’s gonna run away from you, he’s gonna think you’re crazy.” I have two thoughts on his remark. The way he is speaking about Christians, makes it sound like he is not a Christian. This characterization of Christians as hypocrites who purport to build up the kingdom of God, but deep down love the world and promote their own kingdom is harsh. Also, Pre-Tribulation Rapture is the backbone of Behold Israel—Amir is always talking about it. The way he speaks, he infers Pre-Tribulation Rapture is serious Bible doctrine, and that most pastors avoid Bible prophecy altogether to appeal to a broader crowd. But I would ask, how does the idea of getting to miss the hardships in Revelation 6-18 not itch ears? And every day I see people trying to meld evangelism with proclamations of an imminent rapture, like: “Jesus could come at any moment! Repent and call on the name of the Lord today! You really do not want to be left behind for the Tribulation!”
On the parable of the virgins, Jack Hibbs says31, “So, you’ve got the parable of the those with the oil and the lamps, you’ve got ten of them. You’ve got all ten who started, but not all ten finished… the Bible says that at the time of the midnight cry, they all jumped up and trimmed their lamps, but only five had enough oil to continue on. And this is key, symbolically in Scripture, the oil is a reference to the Holy Spirit in your life. And so you can be a believer. Listen carefully, Jesus said, ‘These are they who believe for awhile.’ Doesn’t mean you’re born again to believe. Has your belief brought you to faith in Christ? So these virgins were religious, these virgins were ready, these virgins were waiting, they had lamps, they had oil, but only the ones that had enough oil made it to the end.” It is clear he believes that the foolish virgins are not born again—that they just believe, but do not have real faith. But that does not explain why at midnight they said, “Our lamps are going out.” Lamps do not run without oil, and earlier he is saying that oil is a symbol of the Holy Spirit—and I agree on that. As it is midnight, these virgins apparently had oil the first half of the night. The Holy Spirit is not given to people who are not born again. This parable is about apostasy. The way Jack is teaching it, is like how you would expect someone who believes “Once Saved Always Saved”—the teaching that it is impossible for born again Christians to fall away from their faith, and if someone falls away, it proves that they were never actually born again to begin with. I believe this a very dangerous doctrine.
The Handling of Scripture
The Bible is quoted somewhat throughout the film, but references are almost never given. I do not recall if an actual reference was used anywhere except for Isaiah 26, which was not in context (more about that later). This film will not help a person become more grounded in the Scriptures about the end times, and it could cause or reinforce a lot of confusion.
Sometimes verses are quoted accurately, but the context is not Pre-Tribulation. For example, Kevin says32, “In fact, the Apostle John references this wedding feast when believers are reunited with Christ, as written in the book of Revelation. To those in the final generation he writes, ‘Let us be glad and rejoice and give honor to him, for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and His wife has made herself ready.” This is Revelation 19:7, right before Jesus’ Post-Tribulation coming. But the filmmakers imply a Pre-Tribulation gathering throughout the film. Also, the Bride who enjoys the wedding supper, is of course not limited to the last generation.
I also noticed verses being quoted inaccurately. Kevin says33, “Because of this, Jesus promised that He would return for His bride, to all that have and will accept His promise until the day He returns. To not only be united with but to save his bride from the wrath that is to come upon the world in the last days.” People are familiar with the phrase, “from the wrath to come.” It is from 1 Thessalonians 1:10. But this verse does not say “in the last days”! That phrase comes from other passages and verses (2 Timothy 3:1-5, 2 Peter 3:3-8). I will show you:
1 Thessalonians 1:9-10 (NKJV)
For they themselves declare concerning us what manner of entry we had to you, and how you turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God, 10 and to wait for His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, even Jesus who delivers us from the wrath to come.
You can see these verses are about the promise of salvation. This hope is not only for the ancient Thessalonian believers, but for all time, including us today who also repent and serve the living God. In John chapter 3, the chapter where Jesus tells Nicodemus, “You must be born again,” Jesus explains how the Father sent His Son to the world, to bring everlasting life to those who believe in Him. In verse 18, Jesus says: “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” John the Baptist testifies in a similar manner: “He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe in the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on Him” (John 3:36). So, every person enters this world alienated from God on account of sin, being an object of wrath on a course to the Lake of Fire—if we are not reconciled to God. I am confident this is the wrath 1 Thessalonians 1:10 and 1 Thessalonians 5:9 are talking about. (In 1 Thessalonians 5, believers do not suffer God’s wrath because they walk in the light—that is, they abide in Christ—not because they are off the planet.) But the Before the Wrath folks implicitly define wrath as what comes on the world in the last days—that is, the Tribulation. It is poor scholarship on their part to not define their use of the word, “wrath,” especially when it is in the title of their film, but beyond that, they are piecing phrases of different verses together in such a way as to give a totally different meaning. I believe this is intentional, with the goal to deceive. It reminds me of the Piltdown man fossil hoax, where human and orangutan bones were fraudulently combined; until the deceit was discovered, it was paraded as a missing link.
I also found a reference modern Christian culture falsely associates with the Bible. Kevin narrates34, “But Jesus warns that many will not accept His offer to attend His wedding feast, that there will be many that choose to be separated from Him for all of eternity—those that will be left behind.” Modern religious culture causes folks to associate the words “left behind” with Pre-Tribulation Rapture. Using this term without qualification leaves the impression that the righteous are raptured and the wicked are left behind for the Tribulation. The genesis of this phrase, “one will be taken, the other left,” (Matthew 24:40-41, Luke 17:34-36) is not even about a rapture at all, and it is not Pre-Tribulation, but many people do not realize that, and this film is of course perpetuating that deception. (See Luke 17:37: The Carcasses, the Eagles, and the Taken for a full explanation of “one will be taken, the other left.”)
As mentioned, I can recall only one explicit Scripture reference in the film. Jack Hibbs promises35, “And the righteous will be removed from the earth because the Lord there says in Isaiah 26, ‘I will put them in their place, I will shut the doors behind them in these inner chambers, while I pour out My indignation/wrath upon all those who dwell upon the earth.” But Proverbs 10:30 says, “The righteous will never be removed, but the wicked will not inhabit the earth.” He is taking Isaiah 26 out of context, because I know he is talking about Pre-Tribulation, and this passage is not Pre-Tribulation. The verse he is referencing is Isaiah 26:20: “Come, my people, enter your chambers, and shut your doors behind you; hide yourself, as it were, for a little moment, until the indignation is past.” This is harkening back to the original Passover night, when God supernaturally preserved Israel from the angels of death. It was not because they were Abraham’s descendants that they were shielded, but because they obeyed His words, assembling in homes behind doors marked with blood. “Hide yourself, as it were,” indicates a figurative hiding. The elect who are alive on earth are shielded supernaturally from the wrath of God on the wicked because they hide behind the Door—that is, Jesus—and they walk in the light. The context begins in verse 19, about the resurrection of Messiah’s dead, which 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 teaches occurs at the coming of the Lord. It says: “Your dead shall live; together with my dead body they shall arise. Awake and sing, you who dwell in the dust; for your dew is like the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead.” And verse 21 says, “For behold, the LORD comes out of His place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity; the earth will also disclose her blood, and will no more cover her slain.” Isaiah 26:19-21 is not Pre-Tribulation.
Wicked Symbolism
There is another part to this film that may go unnoticed by many, and that is Masonic or Illuminati symbolism. Freemasonry is a secret society not compatible with Biblical Christianity, blasphemously claiming to bring light, when truly it is darkness. When people get to the higher degrees, they know they are essentially worshipping Lucifer, but a Christian should have discernment even from the beginning, because they are caused to make blood oaths, which is sin, and say things like, “I am in darkness, but I am going into the light.” Why should a Christian who knows Jesus, the Light of the world (John 8:12), say such a thing? Freemasons/Illuminati are encouraged to infiltrate churches and Christian organizations and gain positions of leadership so they can inflict more damage.
When I started the film, at the five second mark, I observed that the distribution company for the film, Exploration Films, has a Masonic-looking logo, highlighting a capstone on a pyramid shape.
Masonic or Illuminati hand signs are frequently found in this film. I do not think there is one scene in which J.D. Farag is pictured without his flashing one or more signs, sometimes even quickly going back and forth between two signs. The signs he uses are the divine king (666) hand sign36, and the devil horns sign37. But the other main contributors also make hand signs, at least once38. There are some who get angry whenever Christians expose the Masonic/Illuminist subject, but that comes across as a red flag to me. It is a reality in our world, and Jesus told us there would be wolves among us. Hand signs can communicate even without a shared language. If you follow world politics, religion, or entertainment at all and you know what to look for, it is pervasive. Hand signs and symbols make me think of this passage from the book of Proverbs:
Proverbs 6:12-15 (NKJV)
12 A worthless person, a wicked man,
Walks with a perverse mouth;
13 He winks with his eyes,
He shuffles his feet,
He points with his fingers;
14 Perversity is in his heart,
He devises evil continually,
He sows discord.
15 Therefore his calamity shall come suddenly;
Suddenly he shall be broken without remedy.
The Bottom Line
I would not recommend this film, unless perhaps if someone wants to have an exercise of discernment or to be able to share with someone who has already seen it. When I watched the film, I stopped it frequently and replayed portions, so I could thoroughly analyze it and afterwards report. I think it could be very easy to miss some of these and accept parts of their presentation without fully engaging the mind in what is being said, for example, whether it is Biblically accurate or historically substantiated. They did a beautiful job with the acting, cinematography, and musical score, but these can also aid in breaking down the mind’s natural barriers when considering the truth of an idea. Between the subtle manipulation of the subject from Jesus’ coming to a “Before the Wrath” (Pre-Tribulation) Rapture, the Gnostic undertones, the discouragement to be a “Berean” when it comes to end times prophecy, the unsubstantiated “discoveries”, the handling of Scripture, and the hand signs, altogether it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Personally, I consider them all wolves, and this Before the Wrath film to be Pre-Tribulation Rapture propaganda.
Footnotes:
1. 0:00:26 – 0:00:50
2. 0:00:56 – 0:01:05 – J.D. Farag quote
3. 0:01:06 – 0:01:32 – Jay McCarl, Jack Hibbs, Jan Markell, J.D. Farag quote
4. 0:01:38 – 0:02:03
5. 0:02:09 – 0:02:45
6. 0:04:16 – 0:04:44
7. 0:05:48 – 0:06:23
8. 0:10:21 – 0:10:38 – Scott McConnell quote
9. 0:09:12 – 0:09:30 – Lizette Dillinger quote
10. 0:10:48 – 0:10:53
11. 0:11:02 – 0:11:09 – J.D. Farag quote
12. 0:11:10 – 0:11:23 – Jay McCarl quote
13. 0:11:34 – 0:11:48
14. 0:22:10 – 0:22:33
15. 0:21:10 – 0:23:10
16. 0:23:11 – 0:23:34
17. 0:23:35 – 0:26:09
18. 0:33:44 – 0:35:36
19. 0:35:37 – 0:36:46, 0:38:36 – 0:39:40
20. 0:55:23 – 0:55:56, 0:56:29 – 0:57:52
21. 1:01:37 – 1:02:19, 1:02:25 – 1:02:47
22. 1:02:48 – 1:02:53
23. 1:04:11 – 1:05:00
24. 1:10:20 – 1:10:50, 1:11:03 – 1:11:21
25. 0:30:29 – 0:30:41
26. 0:30:42 – 0:30:57 – Jack Hibbs quote
27. 0:30:58 – 0:31:16 – Jack Hibbs quote (continued)
28. 0:41:16 – 0:41:30 – Amir Tsarfati quote
29. 0:42:12 – 0:42:46 – Amir Tsarfati quote
30. 0:43:45 – 0:44:09 – Amir Tsarfati quote
31. 0:58:34 – 0:59:22 – Jack Hibbs quote
32. 1:07:51 – 1:08:19
33. 1:09:39 – 1:09:57
34. 1:10:05 – 1:10:19
35. 1:12:09 – 1:12:23 Jack Hibbs quote
36. 0:01:29 – 0:01:30, 0:13:20 – 0:13:21, 0:13:27, 0:20:01, 0:25:39 – 0:25:40, 0:33:36, 0:36:29, 0:43:23, 0:43:42 – 0:43:43, 0:45:31, 0:45:37 – 0:45:38, 0:46:26 – 0:46:27, 0:46:29 – 0:46:33, 0:48:09, 0:48:20, 0:49:10 – 0:49:11, 0:49:21, 0:51:52, 0:52:10, 0:53:48 – 0:53:51, 0:56:04 – 0:56:11, 1:06:21 – 1:06:22, 1:08:51, 1:08:52, 1:08:59 – 1:09:03, 1:09:04 – 1:09:05, 1:16:19, 1:16:22, 1:16:31 – 1:16:34
37. 0:30:01, 0:36:30 – 0:36:34, 0:36:41 – 0:36:44, 0:43:20, 0:43:22, 0:43:28, 0:43:30, 0:45:32, 0:45:39, 0:48:01 – 0:48:08, 0:48:10, 0:49:05, 0:49:12, 0:49:14, 0:51:51, 1:08:55, 1:08:58, 1:09:03, 1:16:20 – 1:16:21, 1:16:23 – 1:16:26, 1:16:31
38. Jay McCarl (16:45; 1:09:30 – 1:09:32; 1:13:10), Jack Hibbs (13:36; 35:58; 36:12), Amir Tsarfati (29:43, 45:16), Jan Markell (42:08, punctuated when she said, “[It’s a] secret”).
